Implementing RAG: Solving LLM Hallucinations with Retrieval Augmented Generation
These articles are AI-generated summaries. Please check the original sources for full details.
The Complete RAG Pipeline
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) provides LLMs access to external documents to prevent factual fabrication. It allows systems to cite exact source passages rather than relying solely on static training data.
Why This Matters
Standard LLMs generate text based on training data, leading to confident but incorrect ‘hallucinations’ when internal or recent company policies are queried. While fine-tuning updates model weights for style and behavior, it is expensive and cannot easily cite sources; RAG solves this by treating the model as a reasoning engine over a dynamic, instantly updatable knowledge base.
Key Insights
- RAG vs Fine-Tuning: Use fine-tuning for behavior/style changes and RAG for factual knowledge and frequently changing data.
- Chunking Strategy: Paragraph-aware chunking generally preserves semantic units better than fixed-size splitting, with recommended sizes of 300-600 characters.
- Vector Indexing: The process involves splitting documents into chunks, converting them into embeddings (e.g., using all-MiniLM-L6-v2), and storing them in a vector database like ChromaDB.
- Evaluation Frameworks: Production RAG quality is measured via RAGAS, which automatically evaluates faithfulness, answer relevancy, and context precision.
Working Examples
Sentence-aware chunking implementation to preserve semantic boundaries.
import re
from typing import List
def chunk_by_sentences(text: str, max_chunk_size: int = 500) -> List[str]:
sentences = re.split(r'(?<=[.!?])\s+', text.strip())
chunks = []
current = ""
for sentence in sentences:
if len(current) + len(sentence) <= max_chunk_size:
current += " " + sentence if current else sentence
else:
if current:
chunks.append(current.strip())
current = sentence
if current:
chunks.append(current.strip())
return chunks
Implementing a full RAG pipeline using LangChain abstractions.
from langchain.text_splitter import RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter
from langchain_community.vectorstores import Chroma
from langchain_community.embeddings import HuggingFaceEmbeddings
from langchain.chains import RetrievalQA
from langchain_community.llms import HuggingFacePipeline
from transformers import pipeline as hf_pipeline
docs = [Document(page_content=content, metadata={'source': name}) for name, content in knowledge_base.items()]
splitter = RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter(chunk_size=400, chunk_overlap=50, separators=['\n\n', '\n', '. ', ' ', ''])
chunks = splitter.split_documents(docs)
embeddings = HuggingFaceEmbeddings(model_name='sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2')
vectorstore = Chroma.from_documents(chunks, embeddings)
retriever = vectorstore.as_retriever(search_kwargs={'k': 3})
gen_pipe = hf_pipeline('text2text-generation', model='google/flan-t5-base', max_new_tokens=200)
llm = HuggingFacePipeline(pipeline=gen_pipe)
qa_chain = RetrievalQA.from_chain_type(llm=llm, retriever=retriever, chain_type='stuff', return_source_documents=True)
Practical Applications
References:
Continue reading
Next article
Grounding LLMs in Maritime Data: Using MCP for Port Intelligence
Related Content
Implementing State-Based AI Workflows with LangGraph Templates
Explore 5 reusable LangGraph agent templates for implementing state-based workflows, including RAG, multi-tool loops, and human-in-the-loop systems.
Beyond the Tutorial: Building an AI Portfolio Based on Real Company Briefs
Move beyond RAG clones with 5 real-world company briefs designed to demonstrate engineering judgment and architectural decision-making.
From Content Creation to Autonomous Action: The Shift to Agentic AI
Agentic AI systems transition from reactive content generation to proactive goal execution, enabling autonomous workflows across APIs and databases with high autonomy.